Author's rights in the digital age: how Internet and peer-to-peer file sharing technology shape the perception of copyrights and copywrongs

Milijana Micunovic, Luka Balković


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v0i0.232

Abstract


Author's rights and copyright law have gone through quite a few changes in the 'post-print' culture of binary systems, digital formations and techno-practices. Technological development supports new concept of author's rights by promoting free internet and digital market, as well as new contemporary experience of culture that is being rooted in digital technology, mass communication and the world of multimedia and virtuality. Though computer and digital technology have served both authors and users in various ways, they have also served as a very fertile ground for sharing copyrighted content thus leading to numerous copyright infringements and conflicts with the copyright law. The aim of this paper is to identify and analyze the ways in which computer and digital technology have given rise to new trends in the production (e.g. remix culture) and consumption (e.g. peer-to-peer file sharing technology) of culture, but also to determine how new forms of distribution, use and sharing of digital content changed and shaped the perception of authorship in the 21st century. In order to analyze the dynamic, nature and structure by which new digital and networking technologies are affecting the concept of authorship and author's rights and to test the consistency of previously established hypotheses, we conducted a survey amongst general public. Altogether 535 questionnaires were completed. Data was analyzed using SPSS tool and quantitative method of analysis. In the analysis special attention was given to both, the concept of authorship in the digital environment and the concept of peer-to-peer file sharing technology as not so new, but still very popular networked architecture for distributing, using and sharing digital content.
Results have shown that most of the respondents use peer-to-peer file sharing technology to access, consume and/or share different cultural content (e.g. movies, music, books, etc.) while violating the rights of copyright holders. That is one of the main reasons why copyright holders and creative industry constantly find new ways to fight peer-to-peer networking technology, especially commercial file sharing, thus sometimes restraining cultural production and even technological development. This leads to conclusion that this new dynamic, decentralized and distributed networked environment grounded in digital democracy and participating culture of prosumers asks for new legal initiatives and solutions. The research shows that the basic understanding of authorship and the right's of authors and other creative workers in the context of Internet culture and digital media hasn't changed a lot, but, by reason of new available digital means of production and tools of consumption, users attitudes, habits and practices towards them have. To resolve this conflict, law needs to find new mechanisms

Keywords


copyright law; author's rights; digital culture; peer-to-peer file sharing; networking technologies

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Aplin, T. 2005. Copyright law in the digital society: the challenges of multimedia. Portland. Hart Publishing.

Atkinson, B., and B. Fitzgerald. 2014. A short history of copyright: the genie of information. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Baldwin, P. 2014. The copyright wars: three centuries of trans-atlantic battle. Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Bell, T. W. 2014. Intellectual privilege: copyright, common law, and the common good. Washington: Mercatus Center.

Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of netwoks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Boon, M. 2010. In praise of copying. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Boyle, J. 2008. The public domain: enclosing the commons of the mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Campbell, R., Martin. C. R., and B. Fabos. 2014. Media and culture: mass communication in a digital age. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.

Cassadeus-Masanell, R. and Hervas-Drane, A. 2010. “Peer-to-peer file sharing and the market for digital information goods.” Journal of economics & management strategy 19, 2: 333-373.

Decherney, P. 2011. “Gag orders: comedy, Chaplin, and copyright”. In Modernism and copyright. Ed. by Paul K. Saint-Amour. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 135 – 144.

Digital Millenium Copyright Act, Pub. L. No. 105-304, 112 Stat. 2860 (Oct. 28, 1998), codified at 17 U.S.C. 512, 1201-05, 1301-22; 28 U.S.C. 4001. Accessed July 7, 2015 http://copyright.gov/legislation/pl105-304.pdf

Doctorow, C. 2008. Content: selected essays on technology, creativity, copyright, and the future of the future. San Francisco: Tachyon Publications.

Endeshaw, A. 2004. Reconfiguring intellectual property for the information age: towards information property?” The Journal of World Intellectual Property 7, 3:327-364.

Firat, A. F., and A. Venkatesh. 1993. “Postmodernity: the age of marketing.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 10, 3: 227-249.

Gantz, J., and J. B. Rochester. 2004. Pirates of the digital millenium: how the intellectual property wars damage our personal freedoms, our jobs, and the world economy. New Jersey: FT Prentice Hall.

Gere, C. 2008. Digital culture. London: Reaktion books.

Gillespie, T. 2007. Wired shut: copyright and the shape of digital culture. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Goldsmith, K. 2011. Uncreative writing: managing language in the digital age. New York: Columbia University Press.

Gordon, S. M. 2005. Are you downloading copyrighted stuff?: stealing or fair use. New Jersey: Enslow Publishers Inc.

Guadamuz, A. 2002. “The new sharing ethic in cyberspace.” Journal of World Intellectual Property 5, 1: 129-137.

Haggart, B. 2014. Copyfight: the global politics of digital copyright reform. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Henry, C., and J. E. Stiglitz. 2010. “Intellectual property, dissemination of innovation and sustainable development.” Global Policy 1, 3: 237-251.

Hettinger, E. C. 1989. “Justifying intellectual property.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 18, 1: 31-52.

Johns, A. 2009. Piracy: the intellectual property wars from Gutenberg to Gates. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Kim, M. 2008. “The creative commons and digital protection in the digital era: uses of Creative Commons licenses.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13: 187-209.

Kleon, A. 2012. Steal like an artist: 10 things nobody told you about being creative. New York: Workman Publishing Company.

Lessig, L. 2001. The future of ideas: the fate of the commons in a connected world. New York: Random House.

Lessig, L. 2004. Free culture: how big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. New York: The Penguin Press.

Lessig, L. 2004. Kod i drugi zakoni kiberprostora. Zagreb: Multimedijalni institut.

Lessig, L. 2008. Remix: making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. London: Bloomsbury.

Levine, R. 2011. Free ride: how digital parasites are destroying the culture business, and how the culture business can fight back. New York: Anchor.

Lites, C. 2014. William Gibson sees the future: but he's not trying to predict it. December 15th 2014. Accessed July 7, 2015 http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2014/12/the_peripheral_william_gibson_discusses_technology_and_predicting_the_future.html

Litman, J. 2006. Digital copyright. New York: Prometheus Books.

Mazziotti, G. 2008. EU digital copyright law and the end-user. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Medak, T. 2008. “Transformations of cultural production, free culture and the future of the Internet.” Digital Culture: The Changing Dynamics. Ed. By Aleksandra Uzelac and Biserka Cvjetičanin. Zagreb: Institute for International Relations. pp. 59-70.

Moyo, L. 2008. “Digital democracy: enhancing the public sphere.” In Digital cultures: understanding new media. Ed. by Glen Creeber and Royston Martin. Maidenhead: Open University Press. pp. 139-156.

Patry, W. 2009. Moral panics and the copyright wars. New York: Oxford University Press.

Patry, W. 2012. How to fix copyright. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ricolfi, M. 2012. “Consume and share: making copyright fit for the digital agenda.” In The digital public domain: foundations for an open culture. Ed. by Melanie Dulong de Rosnay and Juan Carlos De Martin. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. pp. 49-59.

Sganga, C. 2015. “EU copyright law between property and fundamental right: a proposal to connect the dots.” In Balancing copyright law in the digital age: comparative perspectives. Ed. by Roberto Caso and Federica Giovanella. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. pp. 1-26.

Spoo, R. 2011. “Ezra Pound, Legislator: perpetual copyright and unfair competition with the dead.” In Modernism and copyright. Ed. by Paul K. Saint-Amour. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 39-64.

Steinmetz, R., and K. Wehrle. 2005. “What is this “peer-to-peer” about?” Peer-to-peer systems and applications. Ed. by Ralf Steinmetz and Klaus Wehrle. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 9-16.

Terranova, T. 2004. Network culture: politics for the information age. London: Pluto Press.

Tutschku, K.; de Meer, H.; Andersen, F-U., and K. Kawashima. 2004. European Transactions on Telecommunications: Special Issue on P2P Networking and P2P service. Accessed July 7 2015 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ett.1022/epdf

Vaidhyanathan, S. 2001. Copyrights and copywrongs: the rise of intellectual property and how it threatens creativity. New York: New York University Press.

Vassiliou, A. 2013. Culture and copyright in the digital environment: press release speech. Brussels: European Commission. Accessed July 7, 2015 http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-13-94_en.htm

Velagić, Z., and D. Hasenay. 2013. “Understanding textual authorship in the digital environment: lessons from historical perspectives.” Information Research 18, 3. Accessed July 7 2015 http://www.informationr.net/ir/18-3/colis/paperC19.html#.ViQQ85NRpD8

Verma, D. C. 2004. Legitimate applications of peer-to-peer networks. New Jersey: Wiley Interscience.

WIPO. 2008. Study on copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries and archives. Geneva: WIPO.

Zakon o autorskom pravu i srodnim pravima. Narodne novine 167/03. Accessed July 7, 2015 http://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2003_10_167_2399.html

Zakon o izmjenama i dopunama Zakona o autorskom pravu. Narodne novine 58/93. Accessed July 7, 2015 http://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2007_07_79_2491.html

Zekos, G. I. 2005. “Issues on intellectual property in cyberspace.” Journal of World Intellectual Property 5, 2: 233-272.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v0i0.232

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
X




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Libellarium (Online). ISSN 1846-9213 © 2008

ERIH PLUS
doaj.png



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.