Knowledge acquisition process as an issue in information sciences

Boris Bosančić


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v9i1.249

Abstract


The paper presents an overview of some problems of information science which are explicitly portrayed in literature. It covers the following issues: information explosion, information flood and data deluge, information retrieval and relevance of information, and finally, the problem of scientific communication. The purpose of this paper is to explain why knowledge acquisition, can be considered as an issue in information sciences. The existing theoretical foundation within the information sciences, i.e. the DIKW hierarchy and its key concepts - data, information, knowledge and wisdom, is recognized as a symbolic representation as well as the theoretical foundation of the knowledge acquisition process. Moreover, it seems that the relationship between the DIKW hierarchy and the knowledge acquisition process is essential for a stronger foundation of information sciences in the 'body' of the overall human knowledge. In addition, the history of both the human and machine knowledge acquisition has been considered, as well as a proposal that the DIKW hierarchy take place as a symbol of general knowledge acquisition process, which could equally relate to both human and machine knowledge acquisition. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to modify the existing concept of the DIKW hierarchy. The appropriate modification of the DIKW hierarchy (one of which is presented in this paper) could result in a much more solid theoretical foundation of the knowledge acquisition process and information sciences as a whole.
The theoretical assumptions on which the knowledge acquisition process may be established as a problem of information science are presented at the end of the paper. The knowledge acquisition process does not necessarily have to be the subject of epistemology. It may establish a stronger link between the concepts of data and knowledge; furthermore, it can be used in the context of scientific research, but on the more primitive level than conducting of scientific methods. Moreover, the description of this process, as opposed to other problems of information sciences, necessarily involves all four DIKW concepts. Finally, the solution of this problem may result in a more complete theory of information.

Keywords


knowledge acquisition; knowledge acquisition process; information; data; knowledge; DIKW hierarchy

References


Ackoff, R. L. 1989. From data to wisdom." Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 16: 3 − 9. Alavi, M. i D. Leidner. 2001. Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues." MIS Quarterly 25, 1: 107 − 142.Alberico, R. i M. Micco. 1990. Expert systems: for reference and information retrieval, London: Meckler.

Antoniou, G., P. Groth, F. Van Hermelen i R. Hoekstra. 2012. A semantic web primer. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: MIT Press.

Berčić, B. 2012. Filozofija: svezak drugi. Zagreb: Ibis grafika.

Borgman, C. L. 2006. What can studies of e-learning teach us about collaboration in e-research? Some findings from digital library studies." Computer Supported Cooperative Work 15: 359 − 383.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-006-9024-1

Borgman, C. L. 2007. Scholarship in the digital age: information, infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Borko, H. 1968. Information science: What is it?" American Documentation 19, 1: 3 − 5.https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090190103

Bowker, G.C. 2005. Memory practices in the sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Bush, V. 1945. As We May Think." Atlantic monthly 176, 7: 101 − 108. Capurro, R. i B. Hjørland. 2003. The concept of information." Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37, 1: 343 − 411.

Caspi E., A. J. Shankar i J. Wang. 2004. As We May Think, Vannevar Bush. http://www.moralfiber.org/eylon/berkeley/cs294-classics/bush-lecture/bush-as-we-may-think.pdf (pristupljeno 29.4.2016.)

Clark, Donald. 2004. The continuum of understanding. http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/performance/understanding.html (pristupljeno 29.4.2016.)

Cleveland, H. 1982. Information as resource." The Futurist 12: 34 − 39.

Compact Oxford English Dictionary. http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/knowledge?view=uk (pristupljeno 29.4.2016.)

David, P. A. 2004. Towards a cyberinfrastructure for enhanced scientific collaboration: providing its 'soft' foundations may be the hardest part. Oxford Internet Institute research reports: University of Oxford.

David, P. A. i M. Spence. 2003. Towards institutional infrastructures for e-science: the scope of the challenge. Oxford Internet Institute research reports: University of Oxford. http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/publications/RR2.pdf (pristupljeno 14.05.2016)

De Solla Price, D. J. 1963. Little science, big science. New York, London: Columbia University Press.

Dhar, V. 2013. Data science and prediction." Communications of the ACM 56, 12: 64 − 73.https://doi.org/10.1145/2500499

Filozofijski rječnik. 1965. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska.

Floridi, L. 2010. Information: a very short introduction. Oxford: University Press.https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199551378.001.0001

Floridi, L. 2011. The philosophy of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232383.001.0001

Frické, M. 2009. The knowledge pyramid: a critique of the DIKW hierarchy." Journal of Information Science 35, 2: 131 – 142.https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551508094050

Gleick, J. 2011. The information: a history, a theory, a flood. London: Fourth Estate.

Gruber, T. R. 1993. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications." Knowledge Acquisition 5, 2: 199 – 220.

Hey, T. i A. Trefethen. 2003. The data deluge: an e-science perspective, http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/257648/1/The_Data_Deluge.pdf (pristupljeno 14.05.2016)

Jackson, P. 1999. Introduction to expert systems. Harlow, England; Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley

Kalin, B. 1995. Povijest filozofije: s odabranim tekstovima filozofa. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.

Kuhn, T. 2013. Struktura znanstvenih revolucija. Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk.

Legg, C. 2010. Ontologije na semantičkom webu." Vjesnik bibliotekara Hrvatske 53, 1: 155 − 206.

Lyotard, J. F. 1997. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Ma, L. 2012. Meanings of information: the assumptions and research consequences of three foundational LIS theories." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, 4: 716 – 723.

Neurath, O. 1932. Protokolsatze." Erkenntnis 3: 204 − 214. Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation." Organization Science, 5, 1: 14-37.

Nonaka, I. i H. Takeuchi. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

O'Hear, A. 2007. Uvod u filozofiju znanosti. Zagreb: Hrvatski studiji.

Peirce, C.S. i J. Buchler. 1955. Philosophical writings of Peirce. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.

Platon. 1979. Fileb : [ili o nasladi, etički dijalog] ; i Teetet : [ili o znanju, istraživački dijalog]. Zagreb: Naprijed.

Popper, K. Logika naučnog otkrića. Beograd: Nolit, 1972.

Rowley, J. 2007. The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy." Journal of Information Science 33, 2: 163 − 180. Saračević, T. 1999. Information science." Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50, 12: 1051 – 1063.

Saračević, T. 2006. Informacijska znanost." U: Prilozi utemeljenju informacijske znanosti, urednica T. Aparac-Jelušić, 109-131. Osijek: Filozofski fakultet Osijek.

Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication." Bell System Technical Journal 27, 3: 379–423, 623 − 656.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

Shannon, C. E. i W. Weaver. 1963. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Sharma, N. 2008. The origin of the data information knowledge wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292335202_The_Origin_of_Data_Information_Knowledge_Wisdom_DIKW_Hierarchy (pristupljeno 14.05.2016)

Shedroff, N. 2001. An overview of understanding." Information anxiety 2, 27 – 29.

Šikić, Z. 1995. Filozofija matematike. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.

Smith, B. i C. Welty. 2001. Ontology: towards a new synthesis." Proceedings of the International conference on formal ontology in information systems, iii-x. Sosa, E. 1980. The raft and the pyramid: coherence versus foundations in the theory of the knowledge." Studies in the epistemology, Midwest studies in philosophy 5.

Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and its limits. Oxford University Press.

Zeleny, M. 1987. Management support systems: Towards integrated knowledge management." Human Systems Management 7, 1: 59 − 70. Zins, C. 2007. Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, 4: 479 – 493.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v9i1.249

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
X




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Libellarium (Online). ISSN 1846-9213 © 2008

ERIH PLUS
doaj.png



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.